Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maria Sara Popa vs Rasheeda Mcadoo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Popa vs Mcadoo analysis and find out who is favored!
Maria Sara Popa vs Rasheeda Mcadoo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Popa 1 - 0 Mcadoo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Popa has won 42.22% of points on their second serve, while Mcadoo has won 45.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Popa, in recent form, has won 58.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mcadoo has won 55.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.5% and 37.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Popa has saved 51.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mcadoo has saved 57.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Popa has won 67.19% of matches played (W/L 43/ 21), with Mcadoo winning 56.6% (W/L 30/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Popa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 99/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Mcadoo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 73/ 68), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 65/ 64).
- Player level: In the last year, Popa has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 26/ 13), where as Mcadoo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Popa winning 1 times and Mcadoo being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Popa winning 2 and Mcadoo winning 1. The last match between Popa and Mcadoo was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 15-03-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Maria Sara Popa getting the victory 4-6 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Popa and Mcadoo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Popa winning 1 times and Mcadoo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Popa winning 0, and Mcadoo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Popa has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.72 while Mcadoo has played against players with an average rank of 187.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Popa has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mcadoo has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Popa has converted 50.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mcadoo has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
431
Rank
414
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
569
Rank
549
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
58% (110-80)
Career Total W/L
51% (147-143)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
54% (15-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maria Sara Popa | Rasheeda Mcadoo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:0 | 2:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (56/74) | 62% (48/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (36/56) | 54% (26/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 34% (10/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (41/77) | 41% (30/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maria Sara Popa | Rasheeda Mcadoo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 54% (15/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/26) | 53% (36/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (365/288) | 53% (336/301) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (16/8) | 53% (10/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 116 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 118 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:39 | 1:51:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 277.84 | 135.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1446/2031) | 54% (996/1829) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (866/1446) | 68% (677/996) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (247/585) | 46% (383/833) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (158/312) | 46% (96/208) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (1058/2115) | 44% (809/1842) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (19/9) | 54% (15/13) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 54% (15/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (6/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (18/17) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (18/1) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 21% (14/3) |
Maria Sara Popa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Maria Sara Popa
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Maria Sara Popa
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
4
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
25%
(
10 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Maria Sara Popa
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
102)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Maria Sara Popa
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
70 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Mara Gae
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Vanessa Georgiana Popa Teiusanu
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maria Sara Popa
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Despina Papamichail
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
58 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
67 of
128)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Verena Meliss
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Martina Gaemperle
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Rasheeda Mcadoo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
69%
(
81 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
96 of
139)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
55 of
139)
133
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Panna Bartha
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Emily Webley-Smith
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
0
Aces
18
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Berta Bonardi
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Bozovic
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Shannon Lam
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Isabella Aguiar
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Popa Vs Mcadoo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
